and from now on the Oscar nominations have actually verified it: the Academy Awards will likely be a race that is three-way Clint Eastwood’s boxing drama “Million Dollar Baby,” Martin Scorsese’s Howard Hughes biopic “The Aviator,” and Alexander Payne’s road-trip comedy “Sideways.”
Any one of these might be crowned picture that is best of 2004 as how to write a lab report for biology soon as the Oscars are given out Feb. 27. plus it’s anyone’s imagine as to that will triumph. Each carries nominations in every the crucial categories: acting, composing and directing. “The Aviator,” with 11 nominations, is this year’s many nominated movie.
Also nominated for most useful photo are Marc Forster’s “Finding Neverland,” which does not have a most useful manager nomination, and Taylor Hackford’s “Ray,” which appears prone to get hold of an Oscar limited to its celebrity, Jamie Foxx.
Embarrassment of riches: For the 2nd 12 months in a line, a few popular documentaries come in contention, like the clever fast-food satire, “Super Size Me.” additionally nominated are “Born Into Brothels,” “Tupac: Resurrection,” “The Story associated with the Weeping Camel” and “Twist of Faith.” But that leaves out such exceptional non-fiction films as “Touching the Void,” “Home for the Brave” and “Riding Giants,” most of which had been qualified. Eliminated prior to the nominations had been established had been “Control Room,” “The Corporation” additionally the year’s top-grossing documentary, “Fahrenheit 9/11,” which Michael Moore hoped would make a picture nomination that is best. It didn’t take place.
Mel’s “Passion” respected. While Moore’s movie obtained no nominations, the year’s other controversy-stirrer, “The Passion for the Christ,” was nominated for music that is best, cinematography and makeup products.
12 months regarding the biopics: “The Aviator,” “Finding Neverland” and “Ray” all gained nominations for picture that is best. But “Kinsey” and “The Motorcycle Diaries” were mostly shut down.
One of the missing: Sissy Spacek (“A Home at the conclusion for the World”), Eileen Atkins (“Vanity Fair”), Peter O’Toole (“Troy”), Paul Giamatti (“Sideways”), Peter Sarsgaard (“Kinsey”).
Eastwood’s nomination that is double. Eastwood is gathering awards for director that is best since their film made its first, but this is basically the very first time he’s been singled down for most useful actor for “Million Dollar Baby” (he had been formerly selected for most useful actor for “Unforgiven”). Evidently he pressed Giamatti from the list — that could tip the scales in support of “Million Dollar Baby” various other groups.
SAG distinctions: Although there’s considerable overlap between Academy voters and Screen Actors’ Guild people, their nomination listings never fall into line completely. The Oscar voters nominated two players that are supporting won Golden Globes but weren’t mentioned within the SAG nominations: Clive Owen (“Closer”) and Natalie Portman (“Closer”). One of the SAG nominees that didn’t ensure it is to the Oscars: Giamatti, James Garner (“The Notebook”), Cloris Leachman (“Spanglish”) and Freddie Highmore (“Finding Neverland”).
No “City of God.” The film that is brazilian arrived away from nowhere this past year by collecting four major nominations (directing, writing, cinematography, film modifying) has not yet produced a foreign-language followup this present year. Closest calls: “The Motorcycle Diaries,” that will be up for song that is best and greatest screenplay adaptation, and “The Sea Inside,” which can be selected for most useful makeup products and international movie.
It’s Annette vs. Hilary, once again: 5 years ago, Annette Bening (“American Beauty”) lost the Oscar to swank that is hilary“Boys Don’t Cry”). This Bening is selected for “Being Julia” and Swank is selected for “Million Dollar Baby. 12 months” Too near to call? Will the voters bypass them both for Imelda Staunton’s excellent work with “Vera Drake,” that also obtained nominations for Mike Leigh’s way and script?
No directing nomination, no picture winner that is best: It’s extremely difficult to win the most effective image award without having to be selected for most useful manager. “Finding Neverland” didn’t carry its manager, Marc Forster, in to the winners’ circle, therefore it appears like an also-ran when you look at the competition for most readily useful photo. OK, it is happened as soon as since 1932, whenever “Driving skip Daisy” ended up being called most useful photo of 1989 while its manager, Bruce Beresford, wasn’t even yet in the running. But a perform appears extremely not likely.
Who’s supporting whom? In “Collateral,” Jamie Foxx shares an awful great deal of display screen time using the celebrity, Tom Cruise, yet he’s been nominated when you look at the supporting category. In “Sideways,” Thomas Haden Church has just somewhat less display time than Paul Giamatti, yet Church is nominated for best supporting star and Giamatti is definitely the lead within the movie. And do Owen and Portman qualify as supporting really actors? Truly this is certainly absolutely absolutely absolutely nothing brand new: Tatum O’Neal starred in every scene in “Paper Moon,” and Tommy Lee Jones drove the storyline in “The Fugitive,” but both received supporting Oscars. Having said that, in the event that you count their screen time, Anthony Hopkins (“The Silence of this Lambs”) and Patricia Neal (“Hud”) most likely shouldn’t have won the top one. What are the ground guidelines right right here?
Kevin Bacon’s Six Examples Of Omission. Passed over many times by the Oscar voters, such as for the remarkable performance in 1995’s “Murder when you look at the First,” Bacon did his many bold, complex work up to now as a kid molester in “The Woodsman.” He campaigned heartily for recognition, but probably the part ended up being too uncompromising. In 1962, Stuart Whitman had been selected for most useful star for “The Mark,” about a potential youngster molester. Maybe Bacon’s blunder had been playing a character whom really committed the criminal activity.
Lonely at the very top. Catalina Sandino Moreno is selected for most useful actress on her film first in “Maria high in Grace,” but her film is otherwise lacking from crucial groups. The exact same is true of Annette Bening, also nominated for best actress on her work with “Being Julia.”
Foreign-language omissions. The nationwide community of Film experts recently known as Ousmane Sembene’s “Moolaade” the best foreign-language film of 2004, but Senegal would not submit it when you look at the Oscar race, so it’sn’t up for most useful international movie. Other critics’ teams picked Zhang Yimou’s dazzling “House of Flying Daggers,” that was Asia’s official entry into the Oscars, however it ended up being additionally closed away. Inside their destination certainly are a mediocre French movie, “The Chorus,” and Spain’s biopic “The Sea Inside,” which won the Golden Globe for most readily useful foreign movie. Also selected: Sweden’s “As in Heaven,” Germany’s “Downfall” and Southern Africa’s “Yesterday.”
Ethan Hawke ratings being a journalist. Nominated for supporting actor that is best for “Training Day” a couple of years ago, Hawke received their second Oscar nomination for co-writing Richard Linklater’s “Before Sunset” with Linklater and Julie Delpy. The script is partly according to Hawke’s experiences being a novelist that is budding.
Many baffling nomination: “Shark Tale” for best animated feature. Mediocre at the best, this tediously derivative cartoon will be contending with “Shrek 2” and “The Incredibles,” which seems like a shoo-in in this category. “The Incredibles,” like the original “Toy Story,” can be selected for most useful screenplay.
Overdue and underrated. Alan Alda’s nomination for their supporting role being a corrupt politician in “The Aviator” had not been anticipated. Nonetheless it’s the time that is first been selected in a lengthy career, and that alone could carry him in to the winners’ circle . . . Alexander Payne, selected for co-writing and directing“Sideways,” is definitely operating regarding the fringes regarding the Oscars. He and his writing partner, Jim Taylor, had been selected for “Election” however they had been closed out from the race for “About Schmidt.”
Lacking “Rings.” When it comes to first-time since 2001, no hobbits come in the running.